We?re going to be talking a lot about deficits, debt and the federal budget in this election, which may be partisan politics, but will hopefully also get Americans thinking about what the government can do for them, and for how much.
Republican Vice Presidential candidate, Rep. Paul Ryan, R-Wis., makes an appearance at the Iowa State Fair in Des Moines, Monday, Aug. 13, 2012. Ryan's addition to the Romney ticket means fiscal policy will be a large part of the presidential campaign.
Robert Ray/AP
EnlargeWow!? It looks like the federal budget will be front and center in the presidential campaign after all, with this breaking news that Mitt Romney has picked the chairman of the House Budget Committee, Paul Ryan (R-WI), as his running mate.? (CNN?s live blog on the announcement?is here.)
Skip to next paragraph Diane Lim Rogers'EconomistMom' (Diane Lim Rogers) is Chief Economist of the Concord Coalition, a non-partisan, non-profit organization which advocates for fiscal responsibility, and the mom of four (amazing) kids to whom she dedicates her work. She?s been blogging since Mother?s Day 2008.
Recent posts
' +
google_ads[0].line2 + '
' +
google_ads[0].line3 + '
Subscribe Today to the Monitor
Ezra Klein summarizes the implications well here.?I like Ezra?s points about what Romney?s choice of Ryan means for the stark choice that will face voters in Romney-Ryan vs. Obama-Biden:
5.?It?s worth recalling how Ryan became a semi-household name. It wasn?t a Republican strategy to put him forward. As Ryan Lizza?recounts?in his New Yorker profile of Ryan, it was a Democratic strategy to put Ryan forward. Ryan, he writes, ?was caught between the demands of the Republican leaders, who wanted nothing to do with his Roadmap, and his own belief that the Party had to offer a sweeping alternative vision to Obama?s. Ryan soon had an unlikely ally, in Obama himself.? While Republicans were trying to keep Ryan quiet, the Obama administration was trying to make him famous. They saw his plans as the clearest distillation of the GOP?s governing philosophy ? and they thought it would drive voters towards the Democrats. We?ll know in November whether that was a genius strategy or an epic miscalculation?
7. Ryan upends Romney?s whole strategy. Until now, Romney?s play has been very simple:?Don?t get specific. In picking Ryan, he has yoked himself to each and every one of Ryan?s specifics. And some of those specifics are quite?surprising. For instance: Ryan has told the Congressional Budget Office that his budget will bring all federal spending outside Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security to 3.75 percent of GDP by 2050. That means defense, infrastructure, education, food safety, basic research, and food stamps ? to name just a few ? will be less than four percent of GDP in 2050. To get a sense for how unrealistic that is, Congress has never permitted defense spending to fall below three percent of GDP, and Romney has pledged that he?ll never let defense spending fall beneath four percent of GDP. It will be interesting to hear him explain away the difference.
8. It?s not just that Romney now has to defend Ryan?s budget. To some degree, that was always going to be true. What he will now have to defend is everything else Ryan has proposed. Ryan was, for instance, the key House backer of Social Security privatization. His bill,?The Social Security Personal Savings Guarantee and Prosperity Act of 2005, was so aggressive that it was?rejected?by the Bush administration. Now it?s Romney?s bill to defend. In Florida.
Like it or not, America, we?re going to be talking a lot about deficits, debt, the federal budget, and the fundamental role of government in this election.? While the Ryan pick might not be great for future bipartisanship in developing compromise deficit-reduction plans, it will sure get people talking about, and hopefully thinking more about, what they expect the government to do for them and how they are willing to pay for it.
The Christian Science Monitor has assembled a diverse group of the best economy-related bloggers out there. Our guest bloggers are not employed or directed by the Monitor and the views expressed are the bloggers' own, as is responsibility for the content of their blogs. To contact us about a blogger, click here. To add or view a comment on a guest blog, please go to the blogger's own site by clicking on economistmom.com.
Source: http://rss.csmonitor.com/~r/feeds/csm/~3/BrTuLpGv1Sk/Federal-budget-are-you-ready-for-your-close-up
florida debate rand paul mark kirk drew peterson florida gop debate freddie mac kristin cavallari
ShareThis 
Stumble! 
